Landscaper Leaderboard

January 2019

Santa Clara County

Current RankLandscape ContractorAverage
Site Score
1 M Rizzo Inc78.5
2Loral Landscaping76.2
3 Northwest Landscape61.0
4 Silicon Valley Landscape60.0
5New Image Landscape Company52.4
6Jensen Landscape49.5
7 Terracare Associates49.5
8 Alpine Landscapes49.0
9Cagwin and Dorward48.2
10 LandCare47.7
11 Houle Landscaping47.3
12 Jose Sanchez Landscaping43.5
13 Emerald Landscape Company43.2
14 Hernandez Garden43.0
15Pacific Crest Landscape40.1
16 Immaculate Landscape39.5
17FloraTerra Landscape Management39.2
18 Baylands Landscape39.0
19 Dinsmore Landscape Company38.2
20 Vargas Gardening Service38.0
21 Nature's Landscaping37.5
22 One Source Landscape and Golf37.1
23 A&D Landscaping36.6
24Gachina36.4
25 Common Ground Landscape36.0
26 Bay Pro Landscape Services36.0
27 Crystal Springs Landscape34.5
28 ABM34.5
29 Serpico Landscaping33.6
30BrightView: Bay Area33.3
31 F & H Landscaping and Maintenance33.3
32Allied Landscape Services32.8
33Gothic Landscape CA32.8
34 California Landscapes32.0
35 C and B Landscaping31.0
36 Neu-Scapes31.0
37 Green Seasons Landscape29.2
38 FMA Landscape28.2
39JPA Landscaping27.8
40Bayscape Landscape27.7
41 Land Services27.0
42 Bella Vista Landscape27.0
43 Universal Site Services24.8
44Medallion Landscape Management24.6
45 Petalon Landscape Management23.0
46 Building Services Maintenance21.2
47 Del Conte Landscaping20.8
48 Vicente Maciel Landscaping20.6
49 Dan's Gardening20.0
50 Silicon Valley Site Services15.0
51 Mosqueda Landscape15.0
52 Banksia Landscape10.0
53 Magnificent Landscaping8.5
54 GP Landscape4.7

Each site in our program gets a percentile score ranging from 1 to 100 based on how closely actual water use tracks to its Budget Range over the last 12 months relative to all other sites in the program. If a site’s water use stays within the Budget Range in each month, its score is 100. Water use over the Budget Range lowers the score. Water use under the Budget Range also lowers the score but only by a third as much. This scoring encourages sites to consistently follow the seasonal irrigation pattern. While some customers may choose to underwater, our goal is to reduce overwatering without compromising landscape health and appearance.

A score of 75 means that a site has performed better than 75% of its peer sites. A score of 50 means half of its peers are doing better and half are doing worse. A score of 25 means a site is doing better than only 25% of its peers. Efforts to increase irrigation efficiency can improve a site’s percentile rather quickly, as we continually update scores based on the last 12 months of data.

The table above ranks organizations (with 2 or more sites) based on average site score (best at top). The table is updated monthly.

For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your web browser.