Landscaper Leaderboard

March 2019

Santa Clara County

Current RankLandscape ContractorAverage
Site Score
1 M Rizzo Inc80.0
2 Commercial Landscape79.0
3 Loral Landscaping71.7
4 Silicon Valley Landscape62.0
5 Northwest Landscape59.9
6 New Image Landscape Company54.0
7 Hernandez Garden52.0
8 Alpine Landscapes51.0
9 Jensen Landscape50.8
10 LandCare49.3
11 Cagwin and Dorward48.4
12 Houle Landscaping47.7
13 Terracare Associates46.5
14 Emerald Landscape Company45.7
15 Nature's Landscaping42.5
16 FloraTerra Landscape Management42.3
17 Jose Sanchez Landscaping42.0
18 Immaculate Landscape42.0
19 Baylands Landscape40.3
20 Pacific Crest Landscape39.1
21 Dinsmore Landscape Company37.8
22 F & H Landscaping and Maintenance37.3
23 Gachina37.2
24 Vargas Gardening Service37.0
25 A&D Landscaping36.1
26 ABM35.7
27 Common Ground Landscape35.6
28 Bay Pro Landscape Services35.4
29 Allied Landscape Services35.3
30 Gothic Landscape CA35.2
31 One Source Landscape and Golf34.2
32 California Landscapes34.0
33 Neu-Scapes33.5
34 BrightView: Bay Area32.4
35 Serpico Landscaping32.1
36 Crystal Springs Landscape31.7
37 Green Seasons Landscape29.0
38 Land Services29.0
39 JPA Landscaping27.3
40 Medallion Landscape Management25.5
41 Bella Vista Landscape25.4
42 C and B Landscaping25.0
43 Mosqueda Landscape24.5
44 Bayscape Landscape23.7
45 Building Services Maintenance23.6
46 Vicente Maciel Landscaping22.0
47 FMA Landscape22.0
48 Universal Site Services21.8
49 Del Conte Landscaping20.6
50 Petalon Landscape Management19.9
51 Silicon Valley Site Services15.5
52 GP Landscape14.2
53 Banksia Landscape10.0
54 Magnificent Landscaping9.0

Each site in our program gets a percentile score ranging from 1 to 100 based on how closely actual water use tracks to its Budget Range over the last 12 months relative to all other sites in the program. If a site’s water use stays within the Budget Range in each month, its score is 100. Water use over the Budget Range lowers the score. Water use under the Budget Range also lowers the score but only by a third as much. This scoring encourages sites to consistently follow the seasonal irrigation pattern. While some customers may choose to underwater, our goal is to reduce overwatering without compromising landscape health and appearance.

A score of 75 means that a site has performed better than 75% of its peer sites. A score of 50 means half of its peers are doing better and half are doing worse. A score of 25 means a site is doing better than only 25% of its peers. Efforts to increase irrigation efficiency can improve a site’s percentile rather quickly, as we continually update scores based on the last 12 months of data.

The table above ranks organizations (with 2 or more sites) based on average site score (best at top). The table is updated monthly.

For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your web browser.