Landscaper Leaderboard

October 2018

Santa Clara County

Current RankLandscape ContractorAverage
Site Score
1Loral Landscaping75.4
2 M Rizzo Inc60.0
3 Baylands Landscape59.3
4Cagwin and Dorward56.2
5 Northwest Landscape52.6
6 Silicon Valley Landscape51.0
7 Terracare Associates50.2
8 Alpine Landscapes49.0
9 Houle Landscaping48.3
10Jensen Landscape46.1
11Pacific Crest Landscape44.1
12 AAA Gardening43.0
13 Common Ground Landscape42.6
14 Emerald Landscape Company41.3
15 Bay Pro Landscape Services40.6
16 Nature's Landscaping40.5
17New Image Landscape Company40.4
18 A&D Landscaping40.3
19 Green Seasons Landscape37.5
20FloraTerra Landscape Management36.8
21 Vargas Gardening Service36.2
22Bayscape Landscape35.6
23 Serpico Landscaping34.8
24BrightView: Bay Area33.7
25Gachina33.6
26Allied Landscape Services33.0
27 F & H Landscaping and Maintenance32.5
28 One Source Landscape and Golf32.2
29 Dinsmore Landscape Company32.1
30 LandCare31.3
31 Neu-Scapes30.5
32Gothic Landscape CA30.1
33 C and B Landscaping30.0
34 Land Services29.8
35 FMA Landscape29.2
36 Immaculate Landscape29.0
37 Mike Davis Landscape28.9
38 Crystal Springs Landscape28.1
39 Bella Vista Landscape27.8
40 Del Conte Landscaping27.4
41 Petalon Landscape Management26.8
42 California Landscapes26.0
43Medallion Landscape Management25.6
44 Vicente Maciel Landscaping21.8
45 Universal Site Services21.5
46JPA Landscaping21.5
47 Building Services Maintenance19.8
48 Dan's Gardening19.0
49RCC-BGM17.5
50 Magnificent Landscaping11.5
51 Mosqueda Landscape11.0

Each site in our program gets a percentile score ranging from 1 to 100 based on how closely actual water use tracks to its Budget Range over the last 12 months relative to all other sites in the program. If a site’s water use stays within the Budget Range in each month, its score is 100. Water use over the Budget Range lowers the score. Water use under the Budget Range also lowers the score but only by a third as much. This scoring encourages sites to consistently follow the seasonal irrigation pattern. While some customers may choose to underwater, our goal is to reduce overwatering without compromising landscape health and appearance.

A score of 75 means that a site has performed better than 75% of its peer sites. A score of 50 means half of its peers are doing better and half are doing worse. A score of 25 means a site is doing better than only 25% of its peers. Efforts to increase irrigation efficiency can improve a site’s percentile rather quickly, as we continually update scores based on the last 12 months of data.

The table above ranks organizations (with 2 or more sites) based on average site score (best at top). The table is updated monthly.

For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your web browser.