Landscaper Leaderboard

July 2019

Santa Clara County

Current RankLandscape ContractorAverage
Site Score
1 M Rizzo Inc78.2
2 Commercial Landscape76.5
3 Silicon Valley Landscape67.0
4 Loral Landscaping64.2
5 Northwest Landscape58.9
6 LandCare52.0
7 Hernandez Garden51.0
8 Silicon Valley Site Services50.5
9 Jensen Landscape48.8
10 Cagwin and Dorward48.1
11 Terracare Associates48.0
12 Alpine Landscapes47.6
13 Immaculate Landscape47.5
14 New Image Landscape Company47.0
15 Baylands Landscape46.0
16 Jose Sanchez Landscaping44.5
17 Emerald Landscape Company44.2
18 Gachina41.1
19 Pacific Crest Landscape40.4
20 Dinsmore Landscape Company37.4
21 Common Ground Landscape37.2
22 Nature's Landscaping37.0
23 Vargas Gardening Service36.8
24 Bay Pro Landscape Services36.7
25 Land Services36.3
26 Allied Landscape Services35.5
27 Gothic Landscape CA35.5
28 Neu-Scapes35.5
29 Serpico Landscaping35.4
30 Magnificent Landscaping35.3
31 A&D Landscaping34.6
32 One Source Landscape and Golf33.2
33 Del Conte Landscaping33.2
34 BrightView: Bay Area31.9
35 ABM29.8
36 Bella Vista Landscape29.4
37 JPA Landscaping28.8
38 Green Seasons Landscape28.8
39 FloraTerra Landscape Management28.2
40 Houle Landscaping27.0
41 Vicente Maciel Landscaping27.0
42 Crystal Springs Landscape26.4
43 F & H Landscaping and Maintenance26.3
44 Medallion Landscape Management25.8
45 Building Services Maintenance25.6
46 FMA Landscape25.3
47 Bayscape Landscape24.1
48 Petalon Landscape Management21.3
49 Universal Site Services21.2
50 The Shooter Company20.0
51 Banksia Landscape16.5
52 GP Landscape15.0
53 Serrano Landscape15.0
54 C and B Landscaping12.8

Each site in our program gets a percentile score ranging from 1 to 100 based on how closely actual water use tracks to its Budget Range over the last 12 months relative to all other sites in the program. If a site’s water use stays within the Budget Range in each month, its score is 100. Water use over the Budget Range lowers the score. Water use under the Budget Range also lowers the score but only by a third as much. This scoring encourages sites to consistently follow the seasonal irrigation pattern. While some customers may choose to underwater, our goal is to reduce overwatering without compromising landscape health and appearance.

A score of 75 means that a site has performed better than 75% of its peer sites. A score of 50 means half of its peers are doing better and half are doing worse. A score of 25 means a site is doing better than only 25% of its peers. Efforts to increase irrigation efficiency can improve a site’s percentile rather quickly, as we continually update scores based on the last 12 months of data.

The table above ranks organizations (with 2 or more sites) based on average site score (best at top). The table is updated monthly.

For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your web browser.