Landscaper Leaderboard

September 2019

Santa Clara County

Current RankLandscape ContractorAverage
Site Score
1 M Rizzo Inc80.2
2 Commercial Landscape76.5
3 Alpine Landscapes66.0
4 Loral Landscaping62.8
5 Silicon Valley Landscape58.0
6 Jose Sanchez Landscaping54.0
7 Silicon Valley Site Services53.5
8 Hernandez Garden52.5
9 LandCare51.8
10 Immaculate Landscape49.0
11 Cagwin and Dorward47.8
12 Jensen Landscape47.8
13 New Image Landscape Company47.6
14 Northwest Landscape46.8
15 Terracare Associates46.4
16 Land Services45.9
17 Emerald Landscape Company44.9
18 Gachina44.1
19 Baylands Landscape43.5
20 Pacific Crest Landscape41.6
21 A&D Landscaping41.4
22 Common Ground Landscape40.4
23 Del Conte Landscaping39.0
24 Dinsmore Landscape Company39.0
25 Bay Pro Landscape Services38.9
26 Gothic Landscape CA38.6
27 Urbanscapes Landscape Services38.5
28 Houle Landscaping37.9
29 Nature's Landscaping37.5
30 ABM36.8
31 Serpico Landscaping36.8
32 Allied Landscape Services35.7
33 Neu-Scapes35.5
34 FloraTerra Landscape Management35.3
35 One Source Landscape and Golf35.3
36 Vargas Gardening Service35.0
37 Magnificent Landscaping34.7
38 BrightView: Bay Area32.6
39 Vicente Maciel Landscaping32.0
40 Crystal Springs Landscape31.6
41 F & H Landscaping and Maintenance30.7
42 FMA Landscape29.4
43 Romos Landscaping29.3
44 JPA Landscaping29.0
45 Bella Vista Landscape29.0
46 Building Services Maintenance27.6
47 Medallion Landscape Management27.6
48 Bayscape Landscape27.3
49 Green Seasons Landscape26.4
50 Universal Site Services23.0
51 Petalon Landscape Management22.0
52 Banksia Landscape21.4
53 C and B Landscaping19.3
54 GP Landscape19.2
55 Serrano Landscape14.0
56 The Shooter Company12.5

Each site in our program gets a percentile score ranging from 1 to 100 based on how closely actual water use tracks to its Budget Range over the last 12 months relative to all other sites in the program. If a site’s water use stays within the Budget Range in each month, its score is 100. Water use over the Budget Range lowers the score. Water use under the Budget Range also lowers the score but only by a third as much. This scoring encourages sites to consistently follow the seasonal irrigation pattern. While some customers may choose to underwater, our goal is to reduce overwatering without compromising landscape health and appearance.

A score of 75 means that a site has performed better than 75% of its peer sites. A score of 50 means half of its peers are doing better and half are doing worse. A score of 25 means a site is doing better than only 25% of its peers. Efforts to increase irrigation efficiency can improve a site’s percentile rather quickly, as we continually update scores based on the last 12 months of data.

The table above ranks organizations (with 2 or more sites) based on average site score (best at top). The table is updated monthly.

For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your web browser.