Landscaper Leaderboard

May 2019

Santa Clara County

Current RankLandscape ContractorAverage
Site Score
1 M Rizzo Inc81.5
2 Commercial Landscape74.5
3 Loral Landscaping67.3
4 Silicon Valley Landscape64.5
5 Northwest Landscape58.3
6 Alpine Landscapes55.8
7 Hernandez Garden54.5
8 New Image Landscape Company52.0
9 LandCare51.7
10 Terracare Associates50.3
11 Cagwin and Dorward49.8
12 Immaculate Landscape49.5
13 Jensen Landscape49.1
14 Emerald Landscape Company45.6
15 Baylands Landscape44.5
16 Jose Sanchez Landscaping43.5
17 FloraTerra Landscape Management42.7
18 Nature's Landscaping42.0
19 Pacific Crest Landscape41.7
20 Gachina40.5
21 Vargas Gardening Service40.0
22 Houle Landscaping39.7
23 Bay Pro Landscape Services39.7
24 Allied Landscape Services38.5
25 Common Ground Landscape37.8
26 Neu-Scapes37.5
27 Dinsmore Landscape Company37.4
28 Land Services36.6
29 California Landscapes36.0
30 One Source Landscape and Golf35.4
31 Serpico Landscaping35.2
32 Gothic Landscape CA35.1
33 A&D Landscaping34.4
34 Magnificent Landscaping33.7
35 Green Seasons Landscape33.5
36 BrightView: Bay Area32.6
37 Crystal Springs Landscape32.0
38 ABM30.8
39 JPA Landscaping28.7
40 Vicente Maciel Landscaping28.6
41 F & H Landscaping and Maintenance28.6
42 Building Services Maintenance28.1
43 Medallion Landscape Management26.8
44 Del Conte Landscaping26.4
45 Bella Vista Landscape25.6
46 FMA Landscape24.7
47 Bayscape Landscape24.4
48 C and B Landscaping24.2
49 Petalon Landscape Management20.4
50 Universal Site Services19.2
51 Silicon Valley Site Services17.0
52 Serrano Landscape16.0
53 GP Landscape14.4
54 Banksia Landscape12.5

Each site in our program gets a percentile score ranging from 1 to 100 based on how closely actual water use tracks to its Budget Range over the last 12 months relative to all other sites in the program. If a site’s water use stays within the Budget Range in each month, its score is 100. Water use over the Budget Range lowers the score. Water use under the Budget Range also lowers the score but only by a third as much. This scoring encourages sites to consistently follow the seasonal irrigation pattern. While some customers may choose to underwater, our goal is to reduce overwatering without compromising landscape health and appearance.

A score of 75 means that a site has performed better than 75% of its peer sites. A score of 50 means half of its peers are doing better and half are doing worse. A score of 25 means a site is doing better than only 25% of its peers. Efforts to increase irrigation efficiency can improve a site’s percentile rather quickly, as we continually update scores based on the last 12 months of data.

The table above ranks organizations (with 2 or more sites) based on average site score (best at top). The table is updated monthly.

For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your web browser.