Landscaper Leaderboard

August 2019

All Counties

Current RankLandscape ContractorAverage
Site Score
1 ProQual Landscaping83.0
2 M Rizzo Inc79.2
3 Commercial Landscape76.5
4 Greener Maintenance74.5
5 MMM Landscape72.0
6 Procida Landscape71.3
7 ELS Landscape70.5
8 Clean Cut Landscape69.5
9 RH Dupper Landscaping66.8
10 Silicon Valley Landscape65.5
11 K and D Landscaping65.2
12 Loral Landscaping65.0
13 Peak Landscape64.7
14 Four Peaks Landscape Management64.1
15 Creative Outdoor Environments62.7
16 Central Coast Landscape62.5
17 Yard and Garden62.0
18 Alpine Landscapes60.9
19 Professional Landscape Management59.4
20 Stillwater Landscapes58.0
21 Monterey Landscape57.5
22 The Landscape Company55.8
23 Aztec Landscape Maintenance55.2
24 LandCare54.5
25 Grover Landscape Services53.3
26 Michael Driscoll53.2
27 Alpine Landscape Management52.0
28 Silicon Valley Site Services51.5
29 Hernandez Garden50.5
30 Jensen Landscape49.9
31 Emerald City Landscape49.3
32 Cagwin and Dorward48.8
33 Ultimate Lawn Care48.0
34 Quilici Gardening47.3
35 Clean Building Maintenance Co.47.2
36 Northwest Landscape47.2
37 Terracare Associates46.9
38 Coastal Evergreen Landscape46.8
39 Landscape Management Professionals46.0
40 Baylands Landscape46.0
41 Landscape Care Co45.8
42 Jose Sanchez Landscaping45.5
43 Ace Landscaping Service45.5
44 New Image Landscape Company45.0
45 Harvest Moon Landscape44.5
46 Immaculate Landscape44.5
47 Locatelli's Landscaping44.0
48 BrightView: Arizona44.0
49 Altius Landscape43.8
50 Gachina43.1
51 Coast Landscape Management43.0
52 Arreolas Landscaping42.8
53 Emerald Landscape Company42.8
54 BrightView: Central Valley CA42.6
55 Klein Gardening42.0
56 Houle Landscaping41.3
57 Genesis Landscape Solutions40.5
58 Bay Pro Landscape Services40.1
59 Common Ground Landscape39.2
60 Burnett Landscape39.0
61 Pacific Crest Landscape38.9
62 Urbanscapes Landscape Services38.5
63 Dinsmore Landscape Company38.2
64 TLC Landscape Company38.0
65 J. Cozzolino Landscape Management38.0
66 Gothic Landscape CA37.1
67 Vargas Gardening Service36.5
68 Serpico Landscaping36.1
69 Terra Verde Landscape36.0
70 One Source Landscape and Golf35.9
71 Del Conte Landscaping35.6
72 Paradise Landscape35.3
73 FloraTerra Landscape Management35.2
74 Neu-Scapes35.0
75 Bigtree Landscaping34.8
76 Sundance Landscape Maintenance34.7
77 Magnificent Landscaping34.3
78 Nature's Landscaping34.0
79 ABM34.0
80 Land Services33.6
81 Allied Landscape Services33.5
82 A&D Landscaping33.3
83 BrightView: Bay Area32.7
84 Valley Landscaping31.9
85 Naturescape Landscaping30.0
86 JPA Landscaping28.6
87 Crystal Springs Landscape28.6
88 Bella Vista Landscape28.4
89 Three Rivers Landscaping Services27.7
90 F & H Landscaping and Maintenance27.1
91 Vicente Maciel Landscaping26.8
92 Capital Landscape26.5
93 Gold Medal Landscape26.3
94 Medallion Landscape Management26.3
95 Building Services Maintenance26.0
96 FMA Landscape26.0
97 Green Seasons Landscape26.0
98 Marathon Landscape Services25.5
99 Bayscape Landscape24.4
100 Padilla Group24.0
101 Universal Site Services22.5
102 Petalon Landscape Management21.7
103 Banksia Landscape21.3
104 Aqua Green Landscape20.5
105 C and B Landscaping20.3
106 GP Landscape20.2
107 Leon and Son Landscaping17.7
108 Earthcare Maintenance15.5
109 Serrano Landscape15.0
110 The Shooter Company13.5
111 Henry's Sand Hill Landscaping10.5
112 Modica Landscaping8.0
113 Bianco Landscape Management6.0
114 Eco Landscape and Tree2.0

Each site in our program gets a percentile score ranging from 1 to 100 based on how closely actual water use tracks to its Budget Range over the last 12 months relative to all other sites in the program. If a site’s water use stays within the Budget Range in each month, its score is 100. Water use over the Budget Range lowers the score. Water use under the Budget Range also lowers the score but only by a third as much. This scoring encourages sites to consistently follow the seasonal irrigation pattern. While some customers may choose to underwater, our goal is to reduce overwatering without compromising landscape health and appearance.

A score of 75 means that a site has performed better than 75% of its peer sites. A score of 50 means half of its peers are doing better and half are doing worse. A score of 25 means a site is doing better than only 25% of its peers. Efforts to increase irrigation efficiency can improve a site’s percentile rather quickly, as we continually update scores based on the last 12 months of data.

The table above ranks organizations (with 2 or more sites) based on average site score (best at top). The table is updated monthly.

For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your web browser.